And I think the publicity that the topic is now getting

rigite2542@artg

And now there are so many ways to label links. And I suspect that in the long run the wheat will be separated from the chaff, also from Google's perspective. Julian: Yes, there could be one little thing that might play into it. Well, Google currently has a hard time distinguishing between a link that I don't trust and a link that I sold, because they're all the same thing. And if you split that up now, Google might say, okay, let's split it up and then we can do better machine learning on it. But I don't know because they've been doing this for so long/they're basically fighting against link purchases.

If they really try to do this with this method, I don't think it is. So I actually think that Special Data they want to be a little more granular about sponsored and “nofollow”. And continue to treat the follow-purchased links as before. Maybe they'll just take a look, let's see what we can do then, yeah, something like that. Felix: But what can help is awareness now. Because it's harder to explain to people, hey, you somehow have a sponsored link, you have to set it to "nofollow". You have to understand that first, what is it anyway? But if you say, hey, you just have to set it to rel=”sponsored”, then it’s crystal clear what’s going on.



Again and this simplicity that you can say rel=”sponsored” will lead to some newspapers that maybe didn’t know about it before or something like that or maybe there is it's still something like that these days/ Nora: Even smaller ones. Felix: that they're now going to just say okay, I just have to mark this as sponsored. Yes, there are also small webmasters who have done something like that so far. So that you now somehow have a cooperation as a nutritionist or what do I know with some nutritional program or what do I know.